This is part of the Expertise Acceleration topic cluster.

The Most Useful Question to Ask About Expertise

Feature image for The Most Useful Question to Ask About Expertise

Sign up for the Newsletter

    Once a week. Three links. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

    What a question about growth marketing tells us about expertise — and why expert-novice differences are so useful to probe if you're a practitioner.

    One of the nice things about reading a lot of expertise research is that you learn to pay very special attention to questions of the form “what differentiates a top <x> from one who is merely good?” So, for instance, you should listen carefully when a high performance salesperson is asked “what differentiates a top salesperson from one who is merely good?” and “what would an expert do here that a novice wouldn’t?” and also “what mistake would you have made here, were you less experienced?”

    The technical term for these questions is that you are ‘probing for expert-novice differences’, but the overall approach is known as the ‘expert-novice research paradigm’ within the expertise literature. There are some criticisms levelled against this research approach — which we’ll get to in a bit — but it is, broadly speaking, a highly effective tool for getting at the heart of expertise.

    I want to talk a little about why this approach works, and why you might want to ask these questions. To do this, I’ll have to explain the nature of expertise in a specific skill domain.

    I’ll illustrate with one in-depth example.

    About a week ago, I was listening to the Acquired LP podcast, when I heard host Ben Gilbert ask pricing expert Patrick Campbell: “For someone who’s never been around an A-plus growth person, and they kinda feel like a lot of people that they’ve worked with are good … how do you know?

    Originally published , last updated .